Skip to content
SeeTheBug

About

Why we built SeeTheBug

It started with a support queue full of issues that could not be reproduced in the lab.

If you sell software that runs on someone else's workstation or inside their datacenter, you already know the shape of this problem. A customer reports something. You cannot see their machine. They send a description, maybe a screenshot, maybe a log file that turns out to be the wrong one or truncated or from the wrong day. You ask three clarifying questions. Each round trip costs a day. Eventually someone flies out, or the ticket quietly dies.

Meanwhile the tools built for this decade all assume a web app: instrument your frontend, install an SDK, replay the session from the browser. None of that reaches a Desktop application running on a locked-down machine on a network you have never seen. The teams with the hardest support problems have the fewest tools.

What most vendors end up doing is building a "collect support info" utility of their own — a script that gathers logs into a zip. It works, and every vendor rebuilds it from scratch, badly, and it never quite includes the one thing you needed. SeeTheBug is that utility, done properly and built once: guided reproduction, screen and audio capture, log-level control, system and network state, custom collectors, sealed into a single package that can be encrypted end to end.

What we optimize for

The evidence belongs to the vendor, not to us

We built the encryption model first, because a platform that can read your customers’ diagnostic data is a platform your customers will refuse. Configure a key and the payload is sealed to you before it leaves the machine — we hold ciphertext and the routing metadata we need to deliver it.

Nothing goes inside your product

Every tool in this space asks you to instrument your code and ship a build. That is a non-starter when your customer is three releases behind and their upgrade needs a change-control board. So SeeTheBug runs beside your product instead.

The end user is not a tester

The person who can reproduce the bug is usually the person least equipped to describe it. Everything in the client is designed around that: no account, no jargon, no log directories to go hunting for.

Useful on the first case

You should get value from one stubborn ticket, before any rollout, integration, or process change. Everything else is optional and can come later.

See whether it fits your support queue